Rejoinder to Ivari's (2016) Paper: "How to Improve the Quality of Peer Reviews? Three Suggestions for System-level Changes"
نویسنده
چکیده
Peer reviewing is critical in the process of legitimizing new scientific knowledge. Yet, there are concerns about its quality, especially if one considers developmental reviewing as an ideal. The present essay suggests three ways to improve review quality: provide reviewers with systematic feedback about their performance, reward active and good reviewers, and make reviewers more accountable by revealing their identities to the authors on certain conditions.
منابع مشابه
Author Responsibilities in Improving the Quality of Peer Reviews: A Rejoinder to Iivari (2016)
In this rejoinder to Iivari (2016), I discuss authors’ responsibilities in the process of ensuring quality reviews. I argue that one overlooked element in quality peer reviewing is authors’ unconstrained right to submit manuscripts in whatever form or quality they desire. As such, I suggest adding some constraints and offering more freedom to reviewers to maintain viability of the scholarly pub...
متن کاملDetection of Coastline Using Satellite Image-Processing Technique
Extended abstract 1- Introduction Coasts maintain their natural sustainability without human intervention and in spite of short-term changes, we are ultimately confronted with a coastal healthy environment, i.e. natural, rocky beaches, sandy beaches and so on. Today's use of remote sensing in most natural sciences is widespread. Due to the fact that fieldwork is costly and time-consuming, ...
متن کاملEnglish Pronunciation Instruction: A Literature Review
English pronunciation instruction is difficult for some reasons. Teachers are left without clear guidelines and are faced with contradictory practices for pronunciation instruction. There is no well-established systematic method of deciding what to teach, when, and how to do it. As a result of these problems, pronunciation instruction is less important and teachers are not very comfortable in t...
متن کاملپریزما؛ موارد ترجیحی در گزارش مقالات مروری منظم و فراتحلیل
Today, understanding of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and their practical use is essential for who concerned with society's health. Most of the medical reports invoked to these reviews and statements and it is necessary for scientific experts to be familiar with their performing rules and the way of their writing. The basic sciences specialists and clinical professionals study them to ...
متن کاملبررسی تاثیر اجرای نظام پیشنهادها بر یادگیری سازمانی
The purpose of this paper is to study of the casual effect of implementing sug-gestions system on three major aspects of organizational learning known as knowledge acquisition, knowledge distribution and knowledge utilization. Since organizational learning is becoming more important in the world of knowledge-based businesses, managers are more interested to know which management systems & proce...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CAIS
دوره 38 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016